MINUTES OF MEETING
DOUBLE BRANCH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

The regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Double Branch Community Development District was held Monday, February 8, 202 I at 6:00 p.m. at the Plantation Oaks Amenity Center, 845 Oakleaf Plantation Parkway, Orange Park, Florida 32065.

Present and constituting a quorum were:

Cindy Nelsen Chad Davis Scott Thomas Tom Horton Andre Lanier
Also present were: Jim Perry
Michael Eckert
Jay Soriano Chalon Suchsland Abdullah Salam Two Residents

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS

Chairperson Vice Chairman Supervisor Supervisor Supervisor

District Manager District Counsel
Operations Manager - GMS VerdeGo

Roll Call

Mr. Perry called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS	Audience Comments
There being no comments, the next item followed.

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS	Approval of Consent Agenda
Approval of the Minutes of the January 11, 2021 Meeting
Financial Statements
Assessment Receipt Schedule
Check Register
Mr. Perry stated on page 26 there is a  blank where the transcriptionist couldn't  make out what was said. Inserted in there should be "bubblers". It was related to the pump. Included are the financial statements as of December 31, 2020. Your assessments are 96% collected.
Mr. Thomas stated on page 5 it says Mr. Shane Willis. That's actually Shannon Willits.

On MOTION by Mr. Davis seconded by Mr. Thomas with all in favor the Consent Agenda was approved.

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration	of	Resolution	2021-04,
Adopting Prompt Payment Policies
Mr. Eckert stated in doing some due diligence and going through your records I noticed you have not adopted prompt payment policies and procedures. You're already subject to the Prompt Payment Act under Florida Law, which is applicable to all  local governments.  You have to pay your vendors within a certain amount of time, and you have to give  them  fair notice if you dispute a bill and there are some rights that you have and some rights that they have. The statute gives local governments a little bit of leeway in terms of determining what flexibility you have in dealing with payment disputes and dealing with vendors who have not provided you with a proper invoice. All this does is build in that flexibility  the statute allows and protects the district in the event we had a payment dispute with a vendor.

On MOTION by Ms. Nelsen seconded by Mr. Horton with all in favor Resolution 2021-04 adopting prompt payment policies was approved.

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Staff Reports
District Counsel
There being nothing to report, the next item followed.

District Engineer
There being nothing to report, the next item followed.

District Manager
There being nothing to report, the next item followed.

Operations Manager - Memorandum
Mr. Soriano stated I dropped off the tentative schedules for you for the pool and events. In years past our schedule and planning for events has stayed the same. Those may  have slightly changed as far as going towards more movies on the green so people will feel

comfortable so if you look on there I have about six movies planned as of right now. We also threw in another virtual fun run event for the spring and of course spring break is the second week in March. Starting with spring break we will have lifeguards at the pool. The pool schedule follows the same schedule we've had for the last several years. This has been pretty well accepted by the residents and they know why we do certain things  like  the alternating days when they're in school for usage and lifeguards during certain hours. I do have a couple things I wanted  to mention on the events calendar. It's not on the pool  hours yet but I've gotten a lot of requests for later nights at the pools during the summer. I don't think  it's really needed.  I don't think there would be a lot of usage and we're limited. In July we can stay open  until about 9:00 or 9:30_ beca se dusk is not officially until 9:00. I was looking at possibly starting the week after July and going until the kids go back to school, which is the second  or third week in August so it's only about four weeks where we could do late Friday and Saturday nights. I want to make sure with the aquatic staff, mostly Susie with scheduling, that this is something we can do and then we may try that this year. The only other thing I have on the schedule is a quick discussion on the beginning of April. Typically, we do weekends in April. Every once in a while, we get that Easter holiday on the very first weekend and we have been closed in the past. Sometimes that brings complaints because  it's that first weekend  in April  and people are ready to get to the pool. We tend to close for big holidays and Easter is one we have closed for in the past. At times where it falls later in April, we have been open so it's hard to tell residents it's always closed for Easter because  we aren't,  but I  have done that for that first weekend the last time it fell this time of year. I wanted to get your thoughts and get a little direction. Your sister district decided to keep the pools closed, but we can operate separately.
Mr. Davis stated I don't have a dog in the fight so I'm good either way.
Ms. Nelsen stated me too.
Mr. Soriano stated for most other holidays we're open such as  Memorial  Day  and Labor Day since they're recreational-type holidays. It being the first weekend, I don't see a problem staying closed to allow staff their family time too. I will bring this back to you one more time. Our meeting next month occurs before the beginning of all this so I will finalize it and take that out.
Mr. Lanier asked so you're planning on being closed? Mr. Soriano responded yes.

Mr. Soriano continued. I do have one item for you that we put off last month and that is consideration for the Easter vendor  fair. We are getting  to the point where she's got to be able to advertise for her event. I can let you know that she was approached by Rob to possibly use their parking lot. She would have to get permission from all of the stores there, but that would give her a place to go.
Mr. Horton stated it's not very big.
Mr. Soriano stated it is not and I don't know that all those stores would agree. I thought that was a lot he was offering before talking to the rest of them. I told her it was a good idea to keep that in your planning just in case we don't know what we're  going to do  here yet, but I told her she would have to wait until at least this month.
Mr. Horton stated it hasn't gone away yet. It's still with us, so I'm still not crazy about having crowds out there. I know they can be a little spread out, but it's something that's not necessary. Is it something the community is going to get a lot out of or is just something  she can make money off of? I don't think it's that important. We could wait until fall maybe. The numbers are getting better, but I think fall is still a good time to shoot for.
Mr. Lanier stated I personally think it's important for the community, but does  that safety override the event?
Ms. Nelsen stated I'm indifferent.
Mr. Davis stated I don't see a problem with it.
Mr. Thomas stated I kind of liked it. The participation is there, but I also err on the side of caution right now due to the fact that this thing is still out there and we did discuss the legal aspect of it. Would we have responsibility if someone were to catch the virus if we gave them permission?
Mr. Eckert responded no, what I would recommend is we make sure whoever is having
it posts the appropriate signage that most businesses and local governments are posting when they have an event like that and then I think that's something your insurance company has recommended as well as a best practice, but the case law hasn't really developed that much on that issue yet. I don't have a concern if you have the event with appropriate signage. There are events like that going on such as the farmer's market at the St. Augustine amphitheater and  there is signage and masks.

Mr. Soriano stated before we get too far into it, that goes along with our discussion of when we open up that room. I hate to get to the point where we tell her no, but then we say we're going to open up the room for rental. It may be a small party, but now you're in a room. Those two should go together in the decision-making process whether we say yes to both or no to both.
Mr. Horton stated the club room to me is more problematic.
Mr. Soriano stated that makes it easier then if we're going to keep the club room closed then it helps defend that we just don't want to get into anything right now.
Mr. Horton stated another consideration was if you were to have that and  it's  a beautiful day and a bunch of people showed up, including the local TV stations and  they may or may not have a lot of masks on that would make us responsible that we allowed it to happen.
Mr. Davis stated in my opinion it's been a year now almost. If everyone is not aware to
take the necessary precautions when you see it all over the news and everywhere else and you don't wear a mask and stay six feet away from somebody, especially if there is signage up,  that's not on us.
Mr. Horton stated it's just the moral responsibility, I think. If someone is not wearing a
mask and they're spreading it, even if you've got a mask on you still have a potential to get it.
Mr. Davis stated right, so you wear a mask yourself. We're not canceling soccer games and football games and stuff like that.
Mr. Horton stated at least that's not as many.
Mr. Davis stated nobody may show up, we don't know.
Mr. Lanier stated I understand the concerns but I'm kind of leaning toward what you guys are thinking that if we don't have the liability and the farmers market is opening.
Mr. Thomas stated it's a tough call and I see both sides of it. Would holding it off another four or five months actually be a bad thing, because we're still thinking of offering it in the fall.
Mr. Horton stated I think fall could be a safe time to do it.
Mr. Thomas stated I also see that it's something that's been in our community and I myself have benefitted from it and it's nice to get out and we're talking April, when people already have a little bit of cabin fever and want to get out and about and if all these other things

are open, then you have to be an adult and make the appropriate choices. If the signage and the insurance companies say all of this is acceptable, then I would be okay with it.
Mr. Soriano stated I do need some kind of direction because I need to tell her. As far as the room, if you want to do something different that can be something we discuss every month still. There's no need for definite action but for her I need to  be able to tell her something  so she can start planning.
Mr. Thomas stated as far as the room, that's a no. Ms. Nelsen stated we can hold off on that.
Mr. Horton stated I'm still a firm no on having the vendor fair here too. Mr. Davis stated I'm fine with the outdoor event.
Mr. Lanier stated I'm fine with the outdoor event although I understand the concerns.
Mr. Eckert stated if the majority of the Board is giving you direction then you can do that, it doesn't have to be a motion.
Mr. Soriano stated I will speak with her and of course I'll speak to her about  making sure we have the necessary things in place. She was planning that before when it was canceled, and she did a good job with the one here in November.
Mr. Soriano continued there is a special request. I was contacted by a potential eagle scout. She is from one of the only all girl troops here and she would like to do a black box for retired flags. I really like the idea. They would have somebody that comes out and checks the box every month or eve1y other month and take them to do the ceremony. Hopefully we won't have issues with people wanting to steal old, tattered flags. She hasn't given me a spot yet, she just wanted to ask if it was okay. I did have concerns if we start building too many boxes, but I do like this idea and I think it's something that could easily go out in other areas.
Mr. Thomas stated I would definitely be okay with that.
Mr. Davis asked you don't have a specified number of boxes or locations at this point?
Mr. Soriano responded she's just going to do this one but I'm sure we're going to hear from them the same we did with the lending library. I already spoke to your sister district in  case she wants to put it here.
Mr. Soriano stated now moving on to the maintenance side, I do have a couple  items for you. I have an encroachment  issue that I want to talk about really quick. This is a property  at the end of Highland Mill, and this was reported to us by the HOA. His concern was whose

problem is it to take care of it. The highlighted area is the homeowner's area. The other highlighted line going out to the side is a fence that was installed on our property. The current owner has only been there since 2018 but looking at it, it's been there longer so I believe it was the original owner. I didn't get a chance to speak to the people that live there, however the next-door neighbors were there and the original owners were there back in 2005 and they had actually requested to take care of the area themselves so that's where we stopped doing that cul-de-sac. At the moment, that's fine but we haven't been back there to see this. They planted some trees and put in a vinyl fence and like I said, they've kind of taken over that section so my concern going forward is making sure they know. In talking to the HOA that is one of the rental companies now. We may just need to do a license agreement.
Mr. Eckert stated if you wanted to allow the infrastructure to remain, I would suggest you do a license agreement that basically provides that they have permission  to have it there, but that you can revoke that permission at any time as you see fit. It establishes that it's not an adverse possession case because they're not hostile to you, it' s an agreement that you all have worked out that you can revoke at any point in time. Typically, in a situation like that, people are coming to ask for permission for that before they've actually done it and in those cases the resident that is asking for permission pays the cost for preparing the license agreement and reimburses the district. This is a little bit different because it's already there, but it's not their fault that it's there so you guys would have to decide whether or not you want to require that resident if they want to keep it there to pay the cost for preparing the license agreement.
Mr. Davis asked which would be what?
Mr. Eckert responded usually around $500.
Mr. Thomas asked if they did not want the license agreement then we would just go back to taking care of it? Would we take down the final fence then?
Mr. Soriano responded they'd have to take the fence down. We could leave the trees. Mr. Horton asked they' re not taking care of it?
Mr. Soriano responded no it looks good. Mr. Horton asked what's the problem then?
Mr. Soriano responded the concern now is making sure it's on record. We don't want anything to happen and for some reason there's an argument over our property because that is

CDD property. I can contact the rental company first. They may not realize it and they may say they want to get rid of it.
Mr. Thomas asked is the house currently occupied?
Mr. Soriano responded yes, but I didn't get a chance to talk to the people in the house. I can make contact with the rental company and they may make the decision for us.
Mr. Soriano continued. I have an invoice that is not in your packet here; it will be  in next month's packet because I just got it, but I do need to ratify it. It's a little higher than my amount at $2,800 to remove quite a few trees and three were bordering residential properties. It will be invoice 4638 from VerdeGo.

On MOTION by Mr. Davis seconded by Mr. Horton with all in favor tree removal by VerdeGo in the amount of $2,800 was approved.

Mr. Soriano stated lastly, this is another item that just came to me the weekend before. I was contacted by a group that runs the concession stand and they're having a problem with the ice machine and they would like us to repair it as part of the usage agreement. In that last usage agreement, I pointed out that they're supposed to take care of those items because they're using them to make money and we don't use them for anything. I did repair it a couple of years ago and I told them  then that it was going to be the last time, however  they're asking for it now, so  I wanted to point that out because I am going to respond to them that we're not going to repair the ice machine anymore. I can set them up with our contractor though  to give them a good rate, however the district won't pay for that.
Mr. Lanier asked have we opened up the water fountains yet? Mr. Soriano responded yes.
Mr. Horton asked how about where we're going to put the extension for the parking
lot?
Mr. Soriano responded I was contacted last week to try to work out a schedule even
though he originally said it would be end of February or beginning of March so he thinks he's about a month out still so hopefully by the next meeting we will either have a date or the work will have already been started.
Mr. Horton stated there's still a ditch.

Mr. Soriano stated they're not going to fill that in to level it out. They filled in and covered up the pipe farther down, but the asphalt guy is going to have to come in and dig all  that up anyway so there's no sense in putting dirt back in to flatten it out.
Mr. Horton asked why did they dig it up in the first place?
Mr. Soriano responded they dig out the ground and level it and then they have to put on probably six inches worth of sub grade there for the asphalt so then they drop a  lot of small  rock everywhere and then that will come up to the level of the asphalt now.
Mr. Horton asked why the ditch?
Mr. Soriano responded we have a large pipe that was a little shallow so it had  to go down further because if we had poured the asphalt and we had a crack in that pipe we would have had to dig the asphalt up and it was just poor placement. It  was always  designed  to go past that, we just didn't finish it, yet we put the main line irrigation right in the back of it.
Mr. Thomas asked you're fencing around the basketball court is finished?
Mr. Soriano responded it's finished. It's a little more impressive and the screening is up so it's kind of private. The fencing at the storage building should be finished up, there's just the two spots next to the building to stop you from walking into the building so once that's complete, I can start throwing stuff in there because it will be locked down.
Mr. Horton asked we're going to complete the fencing in front of it, right?
Mr. Soriano responded yes.
Mr. Thomas stated they replaced the stop sign that I talked to you about, but they put up their stop sign as opposed to on the decorative post.
Mr. Soriano asked is there an empty decorative post there?
Mr. Thomas responded there is and there is a very contractor grade stop sign.
Mr. Soriano stated we can remove the decorative post. Typically, they just drop it off to us if it's decorative because they're not going to attach the sign to our post. When the posts are taken out by car accident or something like that, that's different and we get them to  put  in theirs, so we know it falls under them. I will find out why they did that.
Mr. Thomas stated to their credit it was less than 24 hours from when I called, and I got  a call back saying it was completed.

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration of Trespass of Individual
from District Property
Mr. Eckert stated this is an item where a person was trespassed from District property and the person requested to be heard by the Board. As our typical process, I'm going to go  ahead and provide you some facts and remind you of what your policies say, and the resident is here and would like to address the Board, so we made this an agenda item rather than handling it under audience comments. The date of the incident that we're talking about is January 10, 2021. The Board has previously been provided with copies of the trespass warrant, copies of policy violation reports, and the witness statement. The Board also has the amenity facility policies that were last revised in 2019. Mr. Salem has been provided  with the trespass warrant as well. In terms of the pertinent policies for you to deal with, under parks and playgrounds no profanity is permitted. Also, additional district policies page 8, there will be no pets except for service animals allowed on any district-owned property. I will note that the situation also involved a dog that was not on a leash, which is a violation of Clay County ordinance. We also had under Suspension and Termination of Privileges, exhibits unsatisfactory behavior, fails to abide by rules, regulations and policies established for use of the facilities, treats personnel or employees of the facility in an unreasonable or abusive manner, engages in conduct that is improper or likely to endanger the welfare, safety or reputation of the center or its management and then finally he was asked to leave after the policy violations were noted and he remained in the facilities after being asked to leave by a facility staff member. Finally, inappropriate behavior such as foul or abusive language, or any of the above actions I just stated are never permitted on district land. Your policy also states that for anyone who is issued a trespass warrant their amenity privileges are suspended for two years and the trespass warrant is effective for two years. That's where we're at today. You have the incident report and I'm not going to go through it. At this point in time, you have all of the  reports from staff for you to look at. I would ask that the record include the policies regarding the amenity facilities dated July 2019, the policy violation report and witness statement, the trespass warning and the minutes from this meeting. Finally, I would remind the Board that this park is property that is owned by the CDD. A CDD is a public entity, but even as a public entity you do  have the ability to adopt rules and policies that govern the use of those facilities and certainly you can govern abusive language or conduct, vulgarity in that park setting, as well as prohibit animals except for service animals from being at those facilities. I would ask you to focus on those

violations and at this point in time I'd be happy to answer any questions ,  but  if  the Board doesn ' t have any questions then I would defer to the resident for five minutes to say what he wants to say to the Board and then we will go from there.  We will have a recommendation  after we hear from the resident.
Mr. Salem stated I've asked the question of whether the property was public  or  not since day one. Let me start with the planning coordinator approached me  out of nowhere  asking for a resident ID card. Are you required to have a resident ID card to have access to the park?
Mr. Davis responded yes you are.
Mr. Salem asked you are required to have a resident ID to have access to a public park?
Mr. Eckert responded you are required to have an ID card to access to a COD-owned property that is there for recreation.
Mr. Salem stated I don't think that's true. I contacted a district manager from another COD in Tampa and confirmed this. So, either he's telling a lie or you're telling a lie. If this is a public entity, the COD owns it, but if the COD is a public entity and owns it, then the public owns it. Yes or no?
Mr. Eckert responded no, the COD owns it. Mr. Salem asked and what is the COD?
Mr. Eckert responded the COD is a community development district, which is a special purpose unit of local government under Florida Law.
Mr. Salem asked  is it a public entity? Mr. Eckert responded it is a public entity.
Mr. Salem stated so this public entity owns this park. Is it private or public? Mr. Eckert responded it is a COD-owned park.
Mr. Salem stated you keep dancing around the question. ls the park public or private? Mr. Eckert responded the park is owned by the COD. I' m not going to argue with you.
You can go ahead and address the Board.
Mr. Salem stated I just want to the Board to acknowledge one thing. I've asked a very unambiguous, direct objective question.

Mr. Davis stated he answered your question before you started talking. He said we are allowed to enforce rules on this CDD-owned  property  and one of the rules is you have to have a card on you, point blank, period, the end on that question.
Mr. Salem stated to access the restricted amenities that are fenced in. You can walk from a cul-de-sac into this park. There are no gates and there are no fences. It' s a public entity surrounded by public roads. The CDD is public. It is public property. The woman should have never approached me in the first place to ask me about my resident ID card. I've confirmed this. Ultimately, I'm part of the collective that is paying for this CDD Board to pay him, so if he wants to go to court, I'm willing to do this. If it's a public entity and I'm a member of the public, she should have never approached me to begin with about a resident ID card. Everything else that he's talking about, happened as a consequence of this action. Technically you haven't charged me with trespassing yet, but you've engaged the police and you made this a criminal matter. About what? About being in a park. For what? I'm a member of the public. People from Argyle, people from the north side and people from the west side can all access this park whether you want to admit it or not. I'm sure you guys try really hard to convince people that is not the case, but it' s absolutely the case. I'm willing to do whatever I have to do to prove it. If we have to go to civil court, then we will go to civil court. Also, I haven' t been trespassed here so more important, I've only been to the athletic center one time and I've been here since 2007. I've been here since I was a baby, but as an adult one time and I can't even tell you the last time I've been there. I got a new puppy and yes, she was off the leash for all of 30 seconds that she got away from me. Okay, I'm sorry about that. She's a puppy. The woman didn't even mention the dog until she didn't have anything else to complain about. She approached me about a resident ID card and I simply asked her ifl needed a resident ID card to be here and she started making up stuff, so I told I didn't care about any of that stuff she was talking about. Ifl'm a member of the public and this is public property, then I'm entitled to be here. I do live here, and I do have a resident ID card, it's right here in my pocket. I didn't have it on me that day, but I've got it. How do you trespass someone from your own community and deny them access to your public park? Then you're going to say, because you can. Well, in your policies and procedures it specifically outlines a system of reprimands. She didn't give me an offense. They keep saying I refused to leave. I was on my way out. I was leaving and I was walking to the car when she approached me . I was kind enough to entertain the woman and

find out what she was asking me for. She ignored the other 40 white people in front of me and didn't ask anybody else for their resident ID cards. There's a security  guard  that works  there and he didn't speak to me one time. You've got a venue coordinator that's picking up trash. I wonder what she gets paid an hour. Wouldn't it be cheaper for us the community to hire a janitor? There are four seats on this Board that will be up for election the next election. I have over 20 family members living in this community. There are four people here. If  each one of  my family members brings 10 people here with them, we can have the board. I also want to know if I am trespassed and this is a public entity and I have business to conduct at the public entity, will I be barred from participating in board meetings? Because I plan on being here for every single one as long as I live here forever. I will be the most participating member of the community there is: All of you guys were talking about this mask thing, like you were going to leave the responsibility up to the general public. You are the CDD board. Take some initiative and have some responsibility. There are old people that live in this neighborhood. He's 100% right. Shame on every single one of you.
Mr. Horton stated you were trespassed because you were belligerent and using profane, foul language at one of our staff members and Mr. Horton was interrupted by Mr. Salem.
Mr. Salem stated after the fact.
Mr. Soriano stated this is not time for you to talk.
Mr. Salem stated sir, I'm a member of the public. If you have rules let me know what they are.
Mr. Eckert stated Mr. Supervisor, if he's not going to listen to you, I'm suggesting that dialogue is probably not going to be productive. Members of the board, if you have questions for each other, or if you have questions for him that's fine, but if you're going to be talked over and talked down to then I think at this point in time you can hear what our recommendation is, and we can move on. We don't need to spend an hour here arguing.
Mr. Davis stated I'd like to hear the recommendation and move on.
Mr. Eckert stated at this point in time, based on the incident and based on what we've heard from our staff in terms of the way our staff was treated and the things that were said, which are not denied here today, they're just said well I did that after I became offended. Our recommendation at this point in time, because it's an automatic suspension for two years, our recommendation would be to reduce that suspension to one year and then after one year if you

don't have any other incidents or violations of the policies or additional trespass, then you  would contact the Sheriffs office and ask them to withdraw that trespass warrant  after one  year. It's within your discretion, but just looking at experiences that we've had we would recommend that you consider going down to one year in terms of the suspension from the amenities.
Mr. Horton stated I'm okay with one year.
Mr. Lanier stated I'd recommend the one-year suspension. Mr. Davis stated I'm on board as well.

On MOTION by Mr. Davis seconded by Mr. Lanier with all in favor reducing the resident's suspension to one year was approved.

Mr . Eckert stated Mr. Salem, you have the right to file a grievance with the Board. That is in our policies and procedures .
Mr. Salem stated I will exhaust every effort and then I will make it a civil matter.
That's what a lawyer would tell me to do.
Mr. Eckert asked and you're familiar with the policies?
Mr. Salem responded according to the manager there are no grievance policies. They wouldn't even field my phone calls for three days. Are you going to email me about this grievance process that suddenly exists?
Mr. Eckert responded I will send you a letter.

SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Audience Comments I Supervisors' .
Requests
Audience Comments
Mr. Salem stated you won't answer my question as to whether I can  attend  the meetings. There's no place I can conduct the business other than here. If there was anywhere else I could conduct the business, then maybe, but I know there isn' t so yes I can come to these meetings. If you'd like to confinn that you're more than welcome.
Supervisor Requests
Mr. Horton stated the sprayer for the track; could you speak to that?

Mr. Soriano responded I didn't finalize it because I would like to get better pricing on  the paint because there are some areas on the tennis courts and basketball  courts that's I'd  like to do also. It's the same paint so I'd like to get a good price from the supplier.
Mr. Horton asked the fence at the dog park, are we finished with that now?
Mr. Soriano responded we just finished this last week. We do have to finish the gazebo. The wrap around the gazebo is where your entry will be and like most other dog parks it will have a double door system, so you'll walk into the gazebo with one gate and you'll have your doors to get into either the little dog side or the big dog side, so we do have to wrap  that  portion, but the outside fence is up. Just to clarify, the railing on the top and all that has  to go up.
Mr. Horton asked have you heard anything on the bridge for the walking trail yet?
Mr. Soriano responded no, I can check to see where they're at with manufacturing, but they told us six to eight weeks and that puts us at the end of February or beginning of March.
Mr. Horton stated I attended the neighborhood engagement team meeting via Zoom for the Sheriffs department and out of that came a response that a Sergeant Prior would like to  move the substation, which is right up the road here and if you've noticed  here  lately, they  don't use it, and they'd like to move it over to phase one. I thought the Sergeant said he was going to be here but I'm sure he must have had something else come up. I was hoping he could give more detail, but I've mentioned  it to Jay since I found  out about it to get his feelings for it. I think it's a good idea and I thought also maybe we could move a spot on our parking lot up front where the recreation center is as you come in the main entrance there on the left there are six parking spots, and we could put the trailer there. We would lose six parking spots, but we will gain 28 when we get that parking lot extension so we're not losing a lot and we'd  be  gaining the presence of the Clay County Sheriff's office on occasion. I just wanted  to run that by. I know nothing is firm yet. Jay mentioned one of the things that would be more convenient for the deputies is there's a restroom they could use there.  Up here there's  not much  they can do. I think it would be a good thing. It's convenient for them and it would  be good  for us to have the presence.
Mr. Thomas asked is there power?
Mr. Soriano responded we can get power pretty easily. I'm not sure what they will need for that.

Mr. Thomas stated I would think no more than 220.
Mr. Soriano stated our box is right there in that corner if we wanted to go that route.  That is very convenient. There's a little argument about losing spaces, but I think that's a good spot. There is the benefit we do have to getting it there compared to some other spots but there are other locations we could do also; I thought about the Village Green area, but I like the amenity center because it is that presence there. The look of the trailer is a little rough, but we could do a little work on that too as far as landscaping. I don't know exactly what they  will  need so if they talk to us and let us know as far as electrical and plumbing. I don't know that they'll need to do much with the plumbing because the amenity  center  is right there.  We're  able to program their cards to work all night long if they need to use the bathrooms.
Mr. Davis stated I'm not opposed to it at all,  but I would  like to hear some more from the Sheriffs office about it if they can make it to the next meeting.
Mr. Thomas asked is there a possible timeline like by the summer?
Mr. Horton responded he seemed excited about getting it done so I guess the sooner we and they can make it happen. I looked at the trailer when I came by and I was thinking  it was not as quite as long as it was. I hope it will fit into those six spots because I think that would be a good place for it.

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Next Scheduled Meeting
Mr. Perry stated the next scheduled meeting is March 8, 2021 at 4:00 p.m. at  this location .

NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Adjournment

On MOTION by Mr. Davis seconded by Ms. Nelsen with all in favor the meeting was adjourned.